<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking the silence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.korslind.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.korslind.com/?p=133</link>
	<description>Blog about Jesus, church and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik Korslind</title>
		<link>http://www.korslind.com/?p=133&#038;cpage=1#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Korslind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.korslind.com/?p=133#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Hey Amic and thanks a lot for the encouragement!

I have to be honest - I really haven&#039;t been following the discussions going on the last couple of weeks. However I have read some of Stefan Swärds posts. Sometimes it seems as if the different sides/perspectives get stuck. I&#039;ve read some books by some of the emergent church representatives. Far to often they paint a picture of the church that seems to leave out many of the positive things happening in the &quot;traditional&quot; church setting. For instance; have a look at &quot;Shaping the things to come&quot; in the chapter were they compare the traditional and emergent perspectives. It turns out to be very contrasted (traditional = bad, emergent = good). 

At the same time representatives of the &quot;traditional&quot; view seems to mix the concepts (maybe because not even the emergent movement is sure about definitions). The apostle Paul knew how to communicate the Gospel in a relevant way. Take for instance the first altar to the Unknown God that was found in Athens. On the rock of the Areopag. It was the meeting place of the Athens Supreme Court of Justice. Paul had his famous speech where he used a language and illustrations that captivated the minds of those who listened. He knew how to find the keys that would open the heart!

I also find Rob Bell and others, to be radical, reminding the church to get the perspectives right once again. But I find it a bit difficult to see what the really big differences are. Take Brian McLaren for instance. As I heard him in Copenhagen a few years ago, I woman in the audience asked &quot;What would be different if I came to your church, to visit?&quot;. Brian answered that he didn&#039;t really know if there would be any difference. It kinda makes you wonder, doesn&#039;t it?  

I&#039;ll publish a post on some thoughts about contextual theology...

Grretings!

// Henrik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Amic and thanks a lot for the encouragement!</p>
<p>I have to be honest &#8211; I really haven&#8217;t been following the discussions going on the last couple of weeks. However I have read some of Stefan Swärds posts. Sometimes it seems as if the different sides/perspectives get stuck. I&#8217;ve read some books by some of the emergent church representatives. Far to often they paint a picture of the church that seems to leave out many of the positive things happening in the &#8220;traditional&#8221; church setting. For instance; have a look at &#8220;Shaping the things to come&#8221; in the chapter were they compare the traditional and emergent perspectives. It turns out to be very contrasted (traditional = bad, emergent = good). </p>
<p>At the same time representatives of the &#8220;traditional&#8221; view seems to mix the concepts (maybe because not even the emergent movement is sure about definitions). The apostle Paul knew how to communicate the Gospel in a relevant way. Take for instance the first altar to the Unknown God that was found in Athens. On the rock of the Areopag. It was the meeting place of the Athens Supreme Court of Justice. Paul had his famous speech where he used a language and illustrations that captivated the minds of those who listened. He knew how to find the keys that would open the heart!</p>
<p>I also find Rob Bell and others, to be radical, reminding the church to get the perspectives right once again. But I find it a bit difficult to see what the really big differences are. Take Brian McLaren for instance. As I heard him in Copenhagen a few years ago, I woman in the audience asked &#8220;What would be different if I came to your church, to visit?&#8221;. Brian answered that he didn&#8217;t really know if there would be any difference. It kinda makes you wonder, doesn&#8217;t it?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll publish a post on some thoughts about contextual theology&#8230;</p>
<p>Grretings!</p>
<p>// Henrik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amic</title>
		<link>http://www.korslind.com/?p=133&#038;cpage=1#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Amic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.korslind.com/?p=133#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Hey!

Nice blog, and congrats to good things happened in your life! 

By the way, speaking of EFK-people and blogs, did you follow the discussion, recently, on some christian blogs about the church movement of Rob Bell (and also generally of the emeriging church in US)? 

People who debated it was people such as the EFK-leader Stefan Swärd, and also bloggers on the Christian paper Dagen (eg. Jaktlunds marginalanteckningar). It was interesting! Especially people like Rob Bell and others seems to me open och radical at the same time, in a great way... Maybe the discussion will continue.. 

Greetings Amic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!</p>
<p>Nice blog, and congrats to good things happened in your life! </p>
<p>By the way, speaking of EFK-people and blogs, did you follow the discussion, recently, on some christian blogs about the church movement of Rob Bell (and also generally of the emeriging church in US)? </p>
<p>People who debated it was people such as the EFK-leader Stefan Swärd, and also bloggers on the Christian paper Dagen (eg. Jaktlunds marginalanteckningar). It was interesting! Especially people like Rob Bell and others seems to me open och radical at the same time, in a great way&#8230; Maybe the discussion will continue.. </p>
<p>Greetings Amic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->